Seems to me that winning items you don't want in order to keep ingredients balanced is well worth the cost. Playing in every event means winning things that you might not want to win and use, why should this event be different? Getting into the highest leagues without spending diamonds won't help to get an extra cottage before the upgrade kits are on offer in the Antique dealer. I'm not sure getting to the end of the event and having a handful of leftover ingredients is such a problem, there are so many ways to obtain them, it sort of makes up for the loss. Maybe an option to spend 25 diamonds to change the recipes would also work, getting 25 diamonds more expensive in every 24 hour period. But it couldn't be much better, introducing an ingredient selection kit would help, but wouldn't make much of a difference. To call the mechanics perfect was doubtless a mistake, I agree. as a rare reward (quest line, DC, and/or incidents would all work) now there is only one strategic option left.Įspecially as players can get stuck with lots of ingredients of one kind even if they follow option 1, just because of having a bad streak with offered recipes or getting only one kind of ingredient from the incidents/DC, I am not against a reintroduction of the exchange ingredients mechanic - but it should be done differently from last years quest variation.Īn easier to implement option to give the players some leeway would be the reintroduction of the "fall ingredient selection kit" - e.g.
Removing the option to exchange ingredients robbed the player of option 2. When the option to exchange ingredients was still in the game, the player had the choice of either:ġ) go for max stars (to get more grand prizes and better league rewards) by choosing the recipe that uses the items that are currently in surplus - hereby getting lots of "junk" itemsĢ) go only for the recipes where the items to be won are "desirable" - hereby sacrificing stars and losing out on grand prizes and league rewards
0 kommentar(er)
